Sign in

ENTERGY CORP /DE/ (ETR) Q4 2016 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q4 2016 was dominated by the finalization of Entergy’s merchant exit and a large non‑cash impairment tied to Indian Point, producing an as‑reported loss of $(9.88) EPS while operational EPS was $0.31 .
  • Management initiated FY 2017 guidance: consolidated operational EPS $4.75–$5.35 and Utility, Parent & Other (UPO) adjusted EPS $4.25–$4.55, with retail sales growth ~1.4% and nonfuel O&M ~$2.6B; EWC operational EPS midpoint $0.65 and average energy+capacity revenue just over $50/MWh .
  • Strategic catalyst: settlement to shut Indian Point Units 2/3 (2020/2021) and the associated $2.4B pre‑tax impairment ($1.5B after tax), completing plans to exit the merchant nuclear fleet and focus on regulated growth .
  • Cash generation remained solid: operating cash flow was ~$750M in Q4; billed retail sales grew +0.8% (weather‑adjusted), supporting UPO trends despite EWC headwinds .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

  • Executed merchant exit plan and repositioning to “pure‑play utility”; CEO: “we completed our plan to exit the merchant power business and transition to a pure play utility,” with UPO adjusted EPS up >40% YoY .
  • Grid modernization and growth pipeline: filings for advanced metering, approvals/progress on St. Charles CCGT and other generation/transmission investments underpin medium‑term earnings trajectory .
  • Guidance confidence: Initiated 2017 ranges and reaffirmed 3‑year UPO outlook targeting 5–7% growth (with lumpiness) from regulated investments and rate actions .

What Went Wrong

  • Large Q4 impairment tied to Indian Point accelerated merchant wind‑down; $2.4B pre‑tax ($1.5B after‑tax) charge drove GAAP loss (EPS $(9.88)) .
  • EWC profitability pressure: operational loss of $(0.04) EPS in Q4 on lower prices/volume and higher decommissioning expense; 2017 EWC midpoint only $0.65 EPS .
  • Cost headwinds: 2017 nonfuel O&M projected at ~$2.6B (+$0.45/share vs. 2016) largely due to higher nuclear spending; potential tax reform could push UPO toward low end of range .

Financial Results

MetricQ2 2016Q3 2016Q4 2016Vs. Estimates (Q4)
EPS (Operational, $)$3.11 $2.31 $0.31 Consensus (S&P Global): unavailable; Alternate Zacks $0.11 → Beat
EPS (As-Reported, $)n/an/a$(9.88) n/a
Revenue ($USD Millions)n/a (SPGI unavailable)n/a (SPGI unavailable)$2,648.5 Consensus estimate $2,937 → Miss
Operating Cash Flow ($USD Millions)$719 ~$1,000 ~$750 n/a

Notes: S&P Global consensus/financials were unavailable during retrieval; revenue and Q4 consensus from Zacks/Yahoo Finance as cited above.

Segment EPS breakdown (Q4 2016):

SegmentEPS (As-Reported)EPS (Operational)
Utility, Parent & Other (UPO)$0.35 $0.27
Entergy Wholesale Commodities (EWC)$(10.23) $(0.04)

KPIs (operational):

KPIQ2 2016Q3 2016Q4 2016
Operating Cash Flow ($mm)$719 ~$1,000 ~$750
Billed retail sales (weather-adjusted, %)n/an/a+0.8%

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
Consolidated Operational EPSFY 2017n/a$4.75–$5.35 Initiated
UPO Adjusted EPSFY 2017n/a$4.25–$4.55 Initiated
Retail Sales GrowthFY 2017n/a~1.4% total; industrial ~3%; res/com <0.25% Initiated
Nonfuel O&MFY 2017n/a~$2.6B Initiated
EWC Avg Energy+Capacity RevenueFY 2017n/aJust over $50/MWh Initiated
EWC Operational EPSFY 2017n/aMidpoint $0.65 Initiated
Dividend trajectoryOngoingRaised in 2016 Expect continuation, subject to Board Maintained
St. Charles CCGT approvalProject milestonen/aApproved by LPSC New milestone

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicQ2 2016 (Previous)Q3 2016 (Previous)Q4 2016 (Current)Trend
Merchant exit (EWC)Continued wind‑down; FitzPatrick sale path; Pilgrim 2019 Reaffirmed downsizing; EBITDA outlook lower Completed plan; Indian Point shutdown agreement; orderly wind‑down through 2021 Accelerating exit; clarity improved
Nuclear performance programFramework under peer review Costs incorporated; 2017–18 lower UPO, 2019 unchanged “Everything on plan”; higher nuclear O&M in 2017 Execution progressing; cost impact near‑term
Grid modernization/AMIVendor selection; filings starting AR/NO filings; deployment from 2019 Filings in four jurisdictions; deployment 2019 Steady execution
Transmission investmentsMultiple projects across states 48 MISO projects ~$480M (MTEP16) Lake Charles Transmission ~$160M by mid‑2018 Ongoing buildout
Regulatory constructs (FRP)AR forward test year; MS FRP AR FRP settlement; LA reset opportunity AR FRP in effect; rates recovering prudent spend Supportive frameworks
Tax reformn/aSensitivity discussed (pension, retail sales) Potential EPS impact $0.10–$0.15 to UPO; excess ADIT, DTA revaluation Watching policy; manageable for utility

Management Commentary

  • CEO: “2016 was a pivotal year…we completed our plan to exit the merchant power business and transition to a pure play utility…our utility, parent and other adjusted earnings reflected over 40% growth year over year” .
  • CFO: “As‑reported loss of $9.88 included special items totaling $10.19 related to the decision to sell or close each of EWC’s nuclear plants…on an operational view, consolidated earnings were $0.31 per share” .
  • CEO on cash/EWC path: “our expectation through 2021 is…about flat from a cash flow perspective…2017 will probably be a negative cash flow year because we have three refueling outages” .

Q&A Highlights

  • Tax reform sensitivity: UPO EPS impact from a 35%→20% rate cut estimated $0.10–$0.15; excess ADIT and DTA revaluation ($580M total, ~$180M utility) would be non‑cash and manageable for customers; potential loss of interest deductibility would bias UPO toward low end of guidance .
  • EWC cash profile: aiming for cash neutrality by 2021; near‑term negative in 2017 due to refueling and severance/retention; decommissioning trust mark‑to‑market in 2018 should increase reported trust income .
  • Arkansas FRP recovery: nuclear‑related costs currently in rates; Commission reviewing, but recovery continues; future filings will true‑up .
  • Nuclear improvement plan: costs and operational progress “on plan”; focus on achieving industry standards and recovering prudent spend through existing constructs .

Estimates Context

  • S&P Global consensus data was unavailable during retrieval; therefore, comparisons below use widely cited third‑party consensus (Zacks/Yahoo Finance).
  • Q4 2016 EPS: Operational actual $0.31 vs. Zacks consensus $0.11 — Beat .
  • Q4 2016 Revenue: Actual $2,648.5M vs. Zacks consensus $2,937M — Miss .
  • Guidance: Management initiated 2017 ranges and detailed drivers (sales, O&M, EWC price deck), implying near‑term estimate revisions to incorporate higher nuclear O&M and tax reform scenarios .

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • The narrative pivot to a regulated “pure‑play utility” is complete; impairment clarifies merchant exit timing and should reduce earnings volatility going forward .
  • UPO growth drivers (rate actions, generation/transmission build, AMI) remain intact; expect lumpiness in 2017–2018 with normalization by 2019 per outlook .
  • Near‑term headwinds: higher nuclear O&M (~$2.6B 2017 nonfuel O&M), EWC refueling cadence, and potential tax reform impacts to EPS mix (manageable cash effect at utility) .
  • Cash flows resilient: ~$750M Q4 operating cash flow; target EWC cash neutrality by 2021 excluding potential NDT top‑offs .
  • Watch regulatory execution (FRP resets, true‑ups, MISO approvals) and AMI deployment pace as catalysts for rate base growth and earnings visibility .
  • Estimate frameworks likely adjust for the operational beat/miss pattern (EPS beat, revenue miss) and for tax reform sensitivities disclosed by management .

Appendix: Indian Point 8‑K (Exhibit 99.1) Highlights

  • Settlement terms: Unit 2 shut by Apr 30, 2020; Unit 3 by Apr 30, 2021; NY to withdraw license renewal objections and issue required environmental permits; Entergy to provide $15M to community/environment initiatives .
  • Financial impact: $2.4B pre‑tax ($1.5B after‑tax) impairment in Q4; additional ~$180M (Indian Point) and ~$310M (six‑plant total) severance/retention through 2021; expected free cash flow impact approximately neutral through end of operations .

Best AI for Equity Research

Performance on expert-authored financial analysis tasks

Fintool-v490%
Claude Sonnet 4.555.3%
o348.3%
GPT 546.9%
Grok 440.3%
Qwen 3 Max32.7%